So in my present times, I'm _trying_ to emulate some effects of reality through pure interactive genetic algorithms, like water, smoke, glass, metal, stone, or simple math figures like flowers and seashells, all of them with more or less accuracy (less accuracy the most).
So I had this fase with the impressionist brushstroke emulation (several images has been done), this is the second I believe. I was mutating brushstrokes from ground zero (I don't use starting textures or images of any kind, only math parameters) and this "ghost" in blue appeared to my eye in the mutation, and I liked it there, over the abstract emulated brushstrokes. So this is it. "Ghost in the brushstrokes". I'm not more than one of those; so let's say it is a dedication to real oil painters, like Olivier Clavel (see left panel for galleries of him), he rocks, one day I'll mail him.
Un blog donde las matemáticas están fortalecidas por la genética para lograr la creatividad computacional que se cruza con el arte.
No hay fractales aquí, sino genética y arte generativo.
[A blog where math is empowered by genetics to achieve computational creativity that intersects with the arts.
A combination of natural selection and computers, somehow. --Not fractals here, but genetics and generative art.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Blog Archive
-
▼
2007
(237)
-
▼
May
(27)
- Abstract Nº1
- Bull gore
- Dawn on the road
- Earth, Water, Fire and Air
- Flower on the sky rocks
- Pyrausta
- Monster aqueron
- Amebas
- Trimmed skies
- In the cave of the spider
- Firefly
- One soul in the crowd
- Death of the swan
- Zebra hunters
- Venetian masks
- Translucent glass nautilus
- Ghost in the brushstrokes
- Victim of a one-eyed dream
- Lamp and wallpaper
- Superdimensional orchid
- Mild sound of the seashell
- Degradation to the public violence
- Hooligans
- The moon and the tides
- Cobra's egg
- Vegetal water
- Hearts afire
-
▼
May
(27)
3 comments:
hi, though i can appreciate the works you´ve done to date, this one in particular i like upon first looking. why? i think it is because it is more painterly. if it were just human-hand-generated i would dismiss it, but knowing that there is computation as the essence of its generation is what makes it all the more special/appealing/acceptable/aesthetically pleasing. it is like a counter-argument to people who say "machines will never do this or that".
ps: you posted on my blog recently, so, kinda returning the compliment :-)
chau.
oops. ok. i now see the blogpost title "ghost in the brushstrokes" -- this suggests that your thinking was akin to mine (maybe). chau.
Forgot to say thanks to you, Jennifer.
Post a Comment